Citations Measure Attention.We Measure Evidence.
The due diligence platform for science.
2.3M
Papers Indexed
47M
Claims Extracted
156K
Contradictions Found
Science has a
reproducibility problem
Socrates taught that wisdom begins with admitting what we don't know. Yet science builds on claims that have never been questioned— citations measure attention, not truth.
of preclinical research fails to replicate
Nature, 2016
wasted annually on irreproducible research
Freedman et al., PLOS Biology
papers published every year—impossible to verify manually
NSF Science & Engineering Indicators
"The unexamined claim is not worth building on."
We built search engines for finding papers. Now we need systems for questioning them.
Truth through
relentless questioning
Socrates exposed truth by asking the right questions. We do the same for science— interrogating every claim against the evidence.
Question
Interrogate every claim
Like Socrates in the agora, we dissect papers into testable assertions. Not abstracts. Not conclusions. The actual claims that demand examination.
Dialectic
Trace the dialogue
Every claim exists in conversation with others—replications, contradictions, refinements. We map the dialogue so you see truth emerge.
Elenchus
Expose contradictions
The Socratic method reveals what doesn't hold up. We score each claim by evidence strength—replications, methodology, consistency—not popularity.
The result? Examined claims with evidence-based confidence scores.
Know what survives scrutiny before you build on it.
See it in action
From paper to claims to evidence — the complete pipeline.
TGF-β Pathway Inhibition by Compound X Reduces Hepatic Fibrosis in Murine Models
Paper Score
5 claims
Extracted Claims
Click a claim to explore
Built for those who
demand examined truth
When decisions cost millions (or lives), you need answers that survive questioning.
Pharma R&D
Validate drug targets before committing years and billions. Know which preclinical findings actually hold up.
⚠️ Bad target selection costs $1B+ and a decade of work.
- Evaluate target validity before project commitment
- Surface replication failures across compounds
- Track mechanism claims across the literature
- Reduce false starts in early discovery
"We spent three years on a target that turned out to be based on irreproducible findings. Never again."
VP Discovery, Top 10 Pharma
We don't accept.
We interrogate.
Citation databases count who's listening. Expert networks collect opinions.
We ask the questions they don't—and show you what survives.
The Socratic difference
Every claim examined
Like Socrates questioning each assumption, we isolate and evaluate claims independently. No assertion escapes scrutiny.
Evidence over authority
Socrates challenged the experts of his day. We challenge citations with replication data—truth isn't a popularity contest.
The dialogue continues
Knowledge evolves through ongoing examination. Our scores update as new evidence enters the conversation.
The dialogue of
evidence
Every claim in conversation with every other. A living dialectic of what science has examined—and what survives questioning.
0
Papers Examined
0
Claims Questioned
0
Dialectic Links
0
Contradictions Exposed
Real-time updates
New papers are processed daily. Scores update as evidence emerges. The graph never sleeps.
Cross-domain links
A finding in oncology might support or contradict one in immunology. We connect the dots.
API-first design
Build your own tools on top of the Science Graph. Structured data, not PDFs.
Built by people who
lived the problem
One of us spent years making clinical decisions on unreliable evidence. The other built systems to find signal in noise at massive scale.
Advisors
Coming soon
Clinical Advisor
Top Academic Medical Center
Coming soon
Science Advisor
Major Pharma R&D
Coming soon
Technical Advisor
Leading AI Company
Founders backed by the same investors as
Join the pursuit of truth
The examined life requires examined evidence. Get early access and join the dialogue.
Trusted by teams from